Monday, 9 November 2009


Another wooden house,- and it can't be more than a few years old. This kind of style is more common these days. Do you like it?
Posted by at
Labels:

9 comments:

Lowell said...

I think it would take some getting used to and it would help if they kept up the property. I also think it probably looks much better on the inside.

Here we don't like wood or frame houses because hurricanes tend to turn them into toothpicks!

9 November 2009 at 21:58
Ann said...

Afraid I don't like it - characterless, although its probably nice inside and easy to live in.

9 November 2009 at 23:42
Clueless in Boston said...

Outside the building looks pretty boring, but inside I'm sure the rooms are large and get a lot of light; if they open the curtains. Given an opportunity to buy something else, I would definitely choose a different style.

10 November 2009 at 03:10
Leif Hagen said...

Fascinating design! I think the wooden outside would demand a lot of maintenance; I want to see inside . . .

10 November 2009 at 04:42
VP said...

It doesn't look like a wooden house, but a normal house covered in wood, which would be even sillier.

10 November 2009 at 08:36
John said...

Agree with comments like 'characterless', but I suspect it is nice and light inside, however, someone needs to do some work outside.

10 November 2009 at 11:21
B SQUARED said...

I would have to vote, no.

10 November 2009 at 15:19
jennyfreckles said...

Er, no...it looks like a block of flats. I rarely like buildings with flat roofs. But it is probably quite convenient to live in a modern building.

10 November 2009 at 22:22
Unknown said...

I love this house!!!

12 November 2009 at 23:01

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)