Monday, 9 November 2009


Another wooden house,- and it can't be more than a few years old. This kind of style is more common these days. Do you like it?

10 comments:

Jacob said...

I think it would take some getting used to and it would help if they kept up the property. I also think it probably looks much better on the inside.

Here we don't like wood or frame houses because hurricanes tend to turn them into toothpicks!

Ann said...

Afraid I don't like it - characterless, although its probably nice inside and easy to live in.

Clueless in Boston said...

Outside the building looks pretty boring, but inside I'm sure the rooms are large and get a lot of light; if they open the curtains. Given an opportunity to buy something else, I would definitely choose a different style.

Leif Hagen said...

Fascinating design! I think the wooden outside would demand a lot of maintenance; I want to see inside . . .

Vogon Poet said...

It doesn't look like a wooden house, but a normal house covered in wood, which would be even sillier.

John said...

Agree with comments like 'characterless', but I suspect it is nice and light inside, however, someone needs to do some work outside.

B SQUARED said...

I would have to vote, no.

Halcyon said...

I like it!

jennyfreckles said...

Er, no...it looks like a block of flats. I rarely like buildings with flat roofs. But it is probably quite convenient to live in a modern building.

JM said...

I love this house!!!